Pressing the mute button on my headset felt like a religious experience, primarily because I had just sneezed seven times in a row with the violence of a collapsing building. Across the screen, a Vice President of something incredibly vague-Strategic Enablement, perhaps, or Global Synergy Management-was leaning so far into his webcam that I could see the reflection of his 27-tab browser in his glasses. He was mid-sentence, his mouth forming the shapes of words that had long ago been stripped of their souls.
‘We need to actionize our learnings to optimize the paradigm shift before the Q3 sunset,’ he said. He looked at us with a practiced, predatory intensity. Not a single person in the 17-person Zoom grid asked what he meant. We all nodded. We were performers in a play where the script had been written by an algorithm that hated humans.
This is the birth of the Jargon Class. It is not merely a group of people who use too many buzzwords; it is a burgeoning social caste that uses linguistic complexity as a form of border control. When we ‘leverage synergies,’ we aren’t actually doing anything. We are signaling to the room that we belong in the room. We are flashing a badge that says, ‘I have spent enough time in windowless conference rooms to have forgotten how to speak to my own mother.’
Signaling
Flashing the badge to show alignment.
Exclusion
Implying others are too slow for velocity.
Velocity
If you don’t know GTM, you are behind.
The Honesty of Craft
My friend Marie C.-P. is a dollhouse architect. It is a profession that demands a terrifying level of precision. When she describes her work, she doesn’t use abstractions. She talks about 0.7-millimeter tolerances and the structural integrity of balsa wood beams. If she were to tell a client that she was ‘re-contextualizing the spatial footprint of the miniature foyer,’ the client would rightly assume she was having a stroke.
She once told me, while painstakingly painting a 1:12 scale portrait, that the moment you lose the ability to name a thing, you lose the ability to fix it.
– Marie C.-P., Dollhouse Architect
We have lost the ability to name what we do in the corporate world, and so we have lost the ability to fix it. We simply re-brand the failure as a ‘pivot’ and move on to the next slide deck.
Jargon as Armor
Jargon is the armor of the intellectually insecure. When an idea is robust, it can be explained to a child or a golden retriever. When an idea is flimsy, or worse, non-existent, it must be wrapped in 107 layers of bubble wrap made of Latinate suffixes and business-school nouns.
The Cost of Wrapping Flimsy Ideas (Conceptual Energy Burn)
We ‘operationalize’ because ‘doing’ sounds too blue-collar. We ‘incentivize’ because ‘paying’ sounds too transactional. We create these linguistic monsters to hide the fact that we are often just guessing. It is a form of magic-the bad kind, where the goal is to make the truth disappear behind a puff of smoke labeled ‘Iterative Scalability.’
I once worked on a project where we spent 47 hours debating the difference between a ‘strategic pillar’ and a ‘core competency.’ By the end of the week, I felt as though my brain had been sanded down with fine-grit paper. We weren’t debating reality; we were debating the costumes that reality should wear. Think of the caloric energy burned every day by millions of people trying to sound like they are ‘adding value’ instead of just being useful.
Tax on Clarity: Rate Skyrocketing
…
[the sound of a word dying]
…
There is a specific kind of violence in the phrase ‘actionize our learnings.’ It turns the act of learning-a beautiful, messy, human process-into a factory-stamped product. It suggests that a realization has no value until it is processed through a machine. This is how the Jargon Class maintains its grip. By complicating the simple, they make themselves necessary. They are the translators of the nonsense they created.
In contrast, look at how pop culture operates; whether you are dissecting the hook of a global hit or exploring the curated aesthetics of KPOP2, the communication is direct, visceral, and immediate. It doesn’t need a glossary to make you feel something. It works because it is clear. Corporate speak works because it is foggy.
I am guilty of this too, of course. I have written emails where I used the word ‘bandwidth’ when I just meant I was tired. I have ‘circled back’ instead of just saying I forgot to do the thing. I admit this mistake with a sense of lingering shame. Each time I use a buzzword, a tiny part of my creative spark dimples and dies. I am 87 percent sure that if we all stopped using jargon tomorrow, half of the middle-management layer in the Western world would vanish like ghosts at sunrise. They would have no ground to stand on because their ground is made of ‘holistic ecosystems’ and ‘omni-channel delivery.’
In 2007, I attended a conference where a speaker spent 57 minutes talking about ‘the democratized landscape of social interconnectivity.’ At the end, a woman in the back stood up and asked, ‘So, you mean people like talking to each other online?’ The speaker looked at her as if she had just spoken in a dead tongue. He couldn’t say yes. To say yes would be to admit that his $777-an-hour consulting fee was based on a truism. He had to re-complicate it. He had to build the wall back up before anyone realized there was nothing behind it.
The Hammer vs. The Touchpoint
If it leaks, you fix the roof.
Rebrand the failure as a ‘pivot.’
Marie C.-P. doesn’t have this problem. There is an inherent honesty in physical craft that we have scrubbed out of our digital cubicles. We have replaced the hammer with the ‘synergy’ and the nail with the ‘touchpoint.’ Is it any wonder that we feel so alienated from our own output? When you can’t describe what you’ve done at the end of the day without using a buzzword, have you really done anything at all?
This linguistic inflation is a bubble that will eventually burst. You cannot build a civilization on ‘pivoting paradigms.’ At some point, someone has to actually build the thing. Someone has to cut the wood, write the code, or bake the bread.
Hull Integrity (Reality Check)
28% Structural
The Jargon Class is currently standing on the deck of a ship, describing the ‘aqueous mobility’ of the ocean, while the hull is scraping against an iceberg of reality. We are so busy ‘aligning’ that we have forgotten how to steer.
A 107-decibel truth whispered in the void.
I recall a moment three weeks ago, during a particularly grueling ‘sync,’ where a junior designer accidentally left her mic on. She sighed-a deep, soul-shattering sound-and whispered, ‘What are we even talking about?’ It was the most honest thing said in that meeting. Then, the VP cleared his throat and said, ‘Let’s take that offline and deep-dive into the feedback loop.’ The spell was recast. The walls went back up.
The Return to the Tactile: Replace This…
‘Socialize’ Ideas $\rightarrow$ Talk About Them
‘Synergy’ $\rightarrow$ Cooperation
‘Leveraging’ $\rightarrow$ Using
The cost of this jargon is not just time; it is our connection to the work and to each other. When we speak in code, we lose the ability to speak from the heart.
The Clearing Fog
Perhaps the next time someone asks you to ‘circle back on the deliverables for the holistic deep-dive,’ you should just stare at them. Or better yet, sneeze seven times in a row. It is a far more human response than any ‘actionable insight’ I have ever heard.
Can we please just say what we mean, or are we too afraid of what we’ll find if the fog finally clears?